![]() If the authors did not make a suggested change, they should provide a rationale for their decision.Īuthors should also include a cover letter to accompany the response to reviewers and the revised manuscript. In the revised manuscript itself, the authors may use highlighting to draw additional attention to the change. Then, each response should clearly explain the change made and where that change can be found in the revised manuscript (i.e., page number, paragraph, and/or line). Authors should distinguish their responses from the reviewers’ comments by using phrases such as “author response” and/or a different font color. The response to reviewers is usually organized by presenting reviewers’ comments one by one, followed by the authors’ response. A response to reviewers specifies how the authors addressed each comment the reviewers made. The APA Science Student Council provides further guidance on and strategies for navigating the peer review process.Īuthors should address this feedback from reviewers in a response to reviewers. For example, reviewers may request that authors provide additional explanatory text, edit overlong passages to be shorter, or conduct additional analyses. ![]() ![]() Journal editors may send the manuscript out for peer review, and then the reviewers suggest changes or pose questions for the authors. Many authors receive an invitation to revise and resubmit their manuscript when the first version of their manuscript has potential for publication but is not quite ready for final acceptance. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |